| Bottle
Bill Expansion – The Truth
Currently there is a $0.05 deposit on beer and soda. The
proposed law would add a $0.05 deposit to water, sports
drinks, juice, including baby juice, and teas. The claim
is that expansion will clean up New York, but consider that
containers make up less than 2.5% of waste generated in
homes and businesses across the State.
If cleaning up New York is the goal, wouldn’t it
make more sense to implement Real Recycling Reform, a program
that would address all litter? The beverage industry supports
Real Recycling Reform. Why are “environmentalists”
focused solely on containers? Is it really about the environment?
Expensive Expansion
An additional $0.15 tax will be added per container increasing
the cost of a case by $3.60. A case of water pre-expansion
costs around $5.99. This same case post-expansion will cost
$9.59. Only $1.20 is refundable. The remaining $2.40 is
the increase the beverage industry has to impose to make
up for the State’s seizure of the unredeemed deposits.
Say NO to more taxes – TAKE ACTION
NOW!
Back
to top
The Nickel Myth
Myth: Unredeemed
nickels are a windfall of cash for the beverage industry.
Fact: The unredeemed
nickels allow for the beverage industry to comply with the
recycling mandates of the initial deposit law without raising
prices any further. Beverage companies use the unredeemed
nickels to fund the costs of drivers and trucks to pick
up the empty containers at retail locations, as well as
the expenses of labor (health benefits and salaries), along
with facilities to unload, sort, and process the containers.
If these unredeemed nickels are taken away, consumer prices
will rise to make up the difference.
Speak out against expansion - Contact your
lawmakers NOW!
Back to
top
Sanitation
Most of the time the redemption area
is located right outside the produce section, and in some
smaller retailers, the redemption area is in the store.
The proposed law specifically states that washing containers
is not required, but is strongly recommended. Picture thousands
of additional sugar and/or syrup-based beverages being redeemed
to an already overwhelmed store. How will a retailer keep
up to code? How will this affect your groceries?
Your grocer is not a garbage dump –
Say NO to expansion!
Back
to top
Inconvenience
Waiting in line to redeem your plastic,
aluminum, and glass containers may already take up more
time than you would like, or have. Expanding the bottle
bill will only add to that time due to the unique packaging
of most water, juice, and sports drink containers –
these containers will not be accepted by the existing machines.
You will have to wait to have these unique containers hand-sorted
and hand-counted. Wouldn’t it be easier to recycle
all of your containers in one bin?
Take back your time – oppose Expansion!
Back
to top
Environment
Beverage containers account for less
than 2.5% of municipal waste generated in homes and businesses
in New York. At best, the proposed expansion that calls to include beverages
such as bottled water, iced teas, sports drinks, and juice
would increase the state’s recycling rate by less
than 0.2% -- a barely measurable change given today’s
30% overall rate.
Expansion is not the solution – ACT
NOW!
Back
to top
Solution – Real Recycling Reform (RRR)
Through
RRR all recyclables and litter will be
addressed, not only beverage containers, through an expansion
of curbside recycling. The expansion of curbside programs
would make it more convenient and more cost-effective for
citizens to participate. Convenience is
created by providing a single place to recycle all materials.
Cost-effectiveness is a result of your
average curbside program costing $125 for each ton of material
recovered, as compared to at least $500 per ton for deposit
initiatives. And through RRR, local communities
would benefit from revenue earned from materials
formerly recycled through the bottle bill.
If cleaning up New York and increasing
recycling rates is the goal, why wouldn’t environmentalists
support Real Recycling Reform?
Say
NO to expansion and YES to Real Recycling Reform
Back
to top
|